facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 1998 Ford Ranger vs 2010 Ford Ranger

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Cargo Space: Cargo Volume

1998 Ford Ranger

Cargo Volume

Trim Cargo Volume ft3 Cargo Volume m3
2WD Regular Cab 6 Ft Box XL Cargo Volume37.4 ft31.06 m3
4WD Regular Cab 6 Ft Box XL Cargo Volume37.4 ft31.06 m3
2WD Regular Cab 6 Ft Box XLT Cargo Volume37.4 ft31.06 m3
4WD Regular Cab 6 Ft Box XLT Cargo Volume37.4 ft31.06 m3
2WD Regular Cab 6 Ft Box SPLASH Cargo Volume37.4 ft31.06 m3
4WD Regular Cab 6 Ft Box SPLASH Cargo Volume37.4 ft31.06 m3
2WD SuperCab 6 Ft Box XL Cargo Volume37.4 ft31.06 m3
4WD SuperCab 6 Ft Box XL Cargo Volume37.4 ft31.06 m3
2WD SuperCab 6 Ft Box XLT Cargo Volume37.4 ft31.06 m3
4WD SuperCab 6 Ft Box XLT Cargo Volume37.4 ft31.06 m3
2WD SuperCab 6 Ft Box SPLASH Cargo Volume37.4 ft31.06 m3
4WD SuperCab 6 Ft Box SPLASH Cargo Volume37.4 ft31.06 m3

2010 Ford Ranger

Cargo Volume

Trim Cargo Volume ft3 Cargo Volume m3
2WD Regular Cab 6 Ft Box XL Cargo Volume37.4 ft31.06 m3
2WD Regular Cab 6 Ft Box XLT Cargo Volume37.4 ft31.06 m3
2WD SuperCab 2dr 6 Ft Box XL Cargo Volume37.4 ft31.06 m3
2WD SuperCab 2dr 6 Ft Box XLT Cargo Volume37.4 ft31.06 m3
2WD SuperCab 2dr 6 Ft Box Sport Cargo Volume37.4 ft31.06 m3
2WD SuperCab 4dr 6 Ft Box XLT Cargo Volume37.4 ft31.06 m3
2WD SuperCab 4dr 6 Ft Box Sport Cargo Volume37.4 ft31.06 m3
4WD SuperCab 4dr 6 Ft Box XLT Cargo Volume37.4 ft31.06 m3
4WD SuperCab 4dr 6 Ft Box Sport Cargo Volume37.4 ft31.06 m3

Go to the Ford Ranger Cargo Space Data.

Compare the Ford Ranger Cargo Space Side-By-Side by Year

2000 vs. 1998

1996 vs. 2006

2007 vs. 2002

2008 vs. 2021

2019 vs. 2009