facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2016 Dodge Viper vs 2009 Dodge Viper

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Height

2016 Dodge Viper

Height

Trim Eng. Drive train Height (in) Height (ft) Height (cm) Height (m)
8.4L V10RWD49.14.09124.71.25
8.4L V10RWD49.14.09124.71.25
8.4L V10RWD49.14.09124.71.25
8.4L V10RWD49.14.09124.71.25

2009 Dodge Viper

Height

Trim Eng. Drive train Height (in) Height (ft) Height (cm) Height (m)
8.4L V10RWD47.63.97120.91.21
8.4L V10RWD47.63.97120.91.21
8.4L V10RWD47.63.97120.91.21

Length

2016 Dodge Viper

Length

Trim Eng. Drive train Length (in) Length (ft) Length (cm) Length (m)
8.4L V10RWD175.714.64446.34.46
8.4L V10RWD175.714.64446.34.46
8.4L V10RWD175.714.64446.34.46
8.4L V10RWD175.714.64446.34.46

2009 Dodge Viper

Length

Trim Eng. Drive train Length (in) Length (ft) Length (cm) Length (m)
8.4L V10RWD175.614.634464.46
8.4L V10RWD175.614.634464.46
8.4L V10RWD175.614.634464.46

Width Without Mirrors

2016 Dodge Viper

Width W/O Mirrors

Trim Eng. Drive train Width W/O Mirrors (in) Width W/O Mirrors (ft) Width W/O Mirrors (cm) Width W/O Mirrors (m)
8.4L V10RWD76.46.37194.11.94
8.4L V10RWD76.46.37194.11.94
8.4L V10RWD76.46.37194.11.94
8.4L V10RWD76.46.37194.11.94

2009 Dodge Viper

Width W/O Mirrors

Trim Eng. Drive train Width W/O Mirrors (in) Width W/O Mirrors (ft) Width W/O Mirrors (cm) Width W/O Mirrors (m)
8.4L V10RWD75.26.271911.91
8.4L V10RWD75.26.271911.91
8.4L V10RWD75.26.271911.91

Wheelbase

2016 Dodge Viper

Wheelbase

Trim Eng. Drive train Wheelbase (in) Wheelbase (ft) Wheelbase (cm) Wheelbase (m)
8.4L V10RWD98.88.232512.51
8.4L V10RWD98.88.232512.51
8.4L V10RWD98.88.232512.51
8.4L V10RWD98.88.232512.51

2009 Dodge Viper

Wheelbase

Trim Eng. Drive train Wheelbase (in) Wheelbase (ft) Wheelbase (cm) Wheelbase (m)
8.4L V10RWD98.88.232512.51
8.4L V10RWD98.88.232512.51
8.4L V10RWD98.88.232512.51

Go to the Dodge Viper Vehicle Dimensions Data.

Compare the Dodge Viper Vehicle Dimensions Side-By-Side by Year

2008 vs. 2006

2005 vs. 2015

2003 vs. 2016

2010 vs. 2009

2017 vs. 2002