facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2002 Mercedes-Benz C 240 vs 2003 Mercedes-Benz C 240

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Cargo Space: Trunk Volume

2002 Mercedes-Benz C 240

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
C230 Coupe Trunk Volume15.3 ft30.43 m3
C240 Sedan Trunk Volume15.3 ft30.43 m3
C320 Sedan Trunk Volume15.3 ft30.43 m3
C32 AMG Trunk Volume15.3 ft30.43 m3

2003 Mercedes-Benz C 240

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
C230 Coupe Trunk Volume9.9 ft30.28 m3
C320 Sport Coupe Trunk Volume9.9 ft30.28 m3
C230 Sedan Manual Trunk Volume12.2 ft30.35 m3
C230 Sedan Automatic Trunk Volume12.2 ft30.35 m3
C240 Sedan Trunk Volume12.2 ft30.35 m3
C240 4MATIC Sedan Trunk Volume12.2 ft30.35 m3
C320 Sedan Trunk Volume12.2 ft30.35 m3
C320 Sport Sedan Trunk Volume12.2 ft30.35 m3
C320 4MATIC Sedan Trunk Volume12.2 ft30.35 m3
C320 Sport Sedan 4MATIC Trunk Volume12.2 ft30.35 m3
C32 AMG Trunk Volume12.2 ft30.35 m3
C240 Wagon Trunk Volume25.2 ft30.71 m3
C240 4MATIC Wagon Trunk Volume25.2 ft30.71 m3
C320 Wagon Trunk Volume25.2 ft30.71 m3
C320 4MATIC Wagon Trunk Volume25.2 ft30.71 m3

Go to the Mercedes-Benz C 240 Cargo Space Data.

AutoPadre's Face

AutoPadre Comparison Tool

Vs.

Compare the Mercedes-Benz C 240 Cargo Space Side-By-Side by Year

2004 vs. 2001

2003 vs. 2002