facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2008 Chevrolet Silverado 3500 vs 2014 Chevrolet Silverado 3500

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Cargo Space: Cargo Volume

2008 Chevrolet Silverado 3500

Cargo Volume

Trim Cargo Volume ft3 Cargo Volume m3
2WD Extended Cab Long Box SRW Work Truck Cargo Volume75.5 ft32.14 m3
2WD Extended Cab Long Box SRW LT w/1LT Cargo Volume75.5 ft32.14 m3
2WD Extended Cab Long Box SRW LT w/2LT Cargo Volume75.5 ft32.14 m3
2WD Extended Cab Long Box SRW LTZ Cargo Volume75.5 ft32.14 m3
2WD Extended Cab Long Box DRW Work Truck Cargo Volume75.5 ft32.14 m3
2WD Extended Cab Long Box DRW LT w/1LT Cargo Volume75.5 ft32.14 m3
2WD Extended Cab Long Box DRW LT w/2LT Cargo Volume75.5 ft32.14 m3
2WD Extended Cab Long Box DRW LTZ Cargo Volume75.5 ft32.14 m3
2WD Crew Cab Long Box SRW Work Truck Cargo Volume75.5 ft32.14 m3
2WD Crew Cab Long Box SRW LT w/1LT Cargo Volume75.5 ft32.14 m3
2WD Crew Cab Long Box SRW LT w/2LT Cargo Volume75.5 ft32.14 m3
2WD Crew Cab Long Box SRW LTZ Cargo Volume75.5 ft32.14 m3
2WD Crew Cab Long Box DRW Work Truck Cargo Volume75.5 ft32.14 m3
2WD Crew Cab Long Box DRW LT w/1LT Cargo Volume75.5 ft32.14 m3
2WD Crew Cab Long Box DRW LT w/2LT Cargo Volume75.5 ft32.14 m3
2WD Crew Cab Long Box DRW LTZ Cargo Volume75.5 ft32.14 m3
4WD Regular Cab Long Box SRW Work Truck Cargo Volume75.5 ft32.14 m3
4WD Regular Cab Long Box SRW LT w/1LT Cargo Volume75.5 ft32.14 m3
4WD Regular Cab Long Box DRW Work Truck Cargo Volume75.5 ft32.14 m3
4WD Regular Cab Long Box DRW LT w/1LT Cargo Volume75.5 ft32.14 m3
4WD Extended Cab Long Box SRW Work Truck Cargo Volume75.5 ft32.14 m3
4WD Extended Cab Long Box SRW LT w/1LT Cargo Volume75.5 ft32.14 m3
4WD Extended Cab Long Box SRW LT w/2LT Cargo Volume75.5 ft32.14 m3
4WD Extended Cab Long Box SRW LTZ Cargo Volume75.5 ft32.14 m3
4WD Extended Cab Long Box DRW Work Truck Cargo Volume75.5 ft32.14 m3
4WD Extended Cab Long Box DRW LT w/1LT Cargo Volume75.5 ft32.14 m3
4WD Extended Cab Long Box DRW LT w/2LT Cargo Volume75.5 ft32.14 m3
4WD Extended Cab Long Box DRW LTZ Cargo Volume75.5 ft32.14 m3
4WD Crew Cab Long Box SRW Work Truck Cargo Volume75.5 ft32.14 m3
4WD Crew Cab Long Box SRW LT w/1LT Cargo Volume75.5 ft32.14 m3
4WD Crew Cab Long Box SRW LT w/2LT Cargo Volume75.5 ft32.14 m3
4WD Crew Cab Long Box SRW LTZ Cargo Volume75.5 ft32.14 m3
4WD Crew Cab Long Box DRW Work Truck Cargo Volume75.5 ft32.14 m3
4WD Crew Cab Long Box DRW LT w/1LT Cargo Volume75.5 ft32.14 m3
4WD Crew Cab Long Box DRW LT w/2LT Cargo Volume75.5 ft32.14 m3
4WD Crew Cab Long Box DRW LTZ Cargo Volume75.5 ft32.14 m3

2014 Chevrolet Silverado 3500

Cargo Volume

Trim Cargo Volume ft3 Cargo Volume m3
Regular Cab Long Box 2-Wheel Drive Work Truck Cargo Volume75.5 ft32.14 m3
Regular Cab Long Box 2-Wheel Drive LT Cargo Volume75.5 ft32.14 m3
Crew Cab Standard Box 2-Wheel Drive Single Rear Wheel Work Truck Cargo Volume60.7 ft31.72 m3
Crew Cab Standard Box 2-Wheel Drive Single Rear Wheel LT Cargo Volume60.7 ft31.72 m3
Crew Cab Standard Box 2-Wheel Drive Single Rear Wheel LTZ Cargo Volume60.7 ft31.72 m3
Crew Cab Long Box 2-Wheel Drive Work Truck Cargo Volume75.5 ft32.14 m3
Crew Cab Long Box 2-Wheel Drive LT Cargo Volume75.5 ft32.14 m3
Crew Cab Long Box 2-Wheel Drive LTZ Cargo Volume75.5 ft32.14 m3
Regular Cab Long Box 4-Wheel Drive Work Truck Cargo Volume75.5 ft32.14 m3
Regular Cab Long Box 4-Wheel Drive LT Cargo Volume75.5 ft32.14 m3
Crew Cab Standard Box 4-Wheel Drive Single Rear Wheel Work Truck Cargo Volume60.7 ft31.72 m3
Crew Cab Standard Box 4-Wheel Drive Single Rear Wheel LT Cargo Volume60.7 ft31.72 m3
Crew Cab Standard Box 4-Wheel Drive Single Rear Wheel LTZ Cargo Volume60.7 ft31.72 m3
Crew Cab Long Box 4-Wheel Drive Work Truck Cargo Volume75.5 ft32.14 m3
Crew Cab Long Box 4-Wheel Drive LT Cargo Volume75.5 ft32.14 m3
Crew Cab Long Box 4-Wheel Drive LTZ Cargo Volume75.5 ft32.14 m3

Go to the Chevrolet Silverado 3500 Cargo Space Data.

AutoPadre's Face

AutoPadre Comparison Tool

Vs.

Compare the Chevrolet Silverado 3500 Cargo Space Side-By-Side by Year

2015 vs. 2011

2017 vs. 2020

2008 vs. 2003

2019 vs. 2010

2005 vs. 2012