facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2008 Mercedes-Benz C 300 vs 2015 Mercedes-Benz C 300

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Cargo Space: Trunk Volume

2008 Mercedes-Benz C 300

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
C300 Sport Sedan Trunk Volume12.4 ft30.35 m3
C300 Luxury Sedan Trunk Volume12.4 ft30.35 m3
C300 4MATIC Sport Sedan Trunk Volume12.4 ft30.35 m3
C300 4MATIC Sedan Trunk Volume12.4 ft30.35 m3
C350 Sport Sedan Trunk Volume12.4 ft30.35 m3

2015 Mercedes-Benz C 300

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
C 250 Coupe Trunk Volume11.7 ft30.33 m3
C 350 Coupe Trunk Volume11.7 ft30.33 m3
C 63 AMG Coupe Trunk Volume11.7 ft30.33 m3
C 350 4MATIC Coupe Trunk Volume11.7 ft30.33 m3
C 300 Sedan Trunk Volume12.6 ft30.36 m3
C 300 Sport Sedan Trunk Volume12.6 ft30.36 m3
C 300 Luxury Sedan Trunk Volume12.6 ft30.36 m3
AMG C 63 Sedan Trunk Volume12.6 ft30.36 m3
AMG C 63 S Sedan Trunk Volume12.6 ft30.36 m3
C 300 4MATIC Sedan Trunk Volume12.6 ft30.36 m3
C 300 4MATIC Sport Sedan Trunk Volume12.6 ft30.36 m3
C 300 4MATIC Luxury Sedan Trunk Volume12.6 ft30.36 m3
C 400 4MATIC Sedan Trunk Volume12.6 ft30.36 m3

Go to the Mercedes-Benz C 300 Cargo Space Data.

Compare the Mercedes-Benz C 300 Cargo Space Side-By-Side by Year

2019 vs. 2010

2015 vs. 2013

2018 vs. 2011

2016 vs. 2012

2008 vs. 2009