facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2009 Mercedes-Benz C 300 vs 2016 Mercedes-Benz C 300

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Cargo Space: Trunk Volume

2009 Mercedes-Benz C 300

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
C300 Sport Sedan Trunk Volume12.4 ft30.35 m3
C300 4MATIC Sport Sedan Trunk Volume12.4 ft30.35 m3
C300 Luxury Sedan Trunk Volume12.4 ft30.35 m3
C300 4MATIC Sedan Trunk Volume12.4 ft30.35 m3
C350 Sport Sedan Trunk Volume12.4 ft30.35 m3

2016 Mercedes-Benz C 300

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
C 300 Sedan Trunk Volume12.6 ft30.36 m3
C 300 Sport Sedan Trunk Volume12.6 ft30.36 m3
C 300 Luxury Sedan Trunk Volume12.6 ft30.36 m3
C 350e Sedan Trunk Volume11.8 ft30.33 m3
C 350e Luxury Sedan Trunk Volume11.8 ft30.33 m3
AMG C 63 Sedan Trunk Volume12.6 ft30.36 m3
AMG C 63 S Sedan Trunk Volume12.6 ft30.36 m3
C 300 4MATIC Sedan Trunk Volume12.6 ft30.36 m3
C 300 4MATIC Sport Sedan Trunk Volume12.6 ft30.36 m3
C 300 4MATIC Luxury Sedan Trunk Volume12.6 ft30.36 m3
C 450 AMG 4MATIC Sedan Trunk Volume12.6 ft30.36 m3

Go to the Mercedes-Benz C 300 Cargo Space Data.

AutoPadre's Face

AutoPadre Comparison Tool

Vs.

Compare the Mercedes-Benz C 300 Cargo Space Side-By-Side by Year

2019 vs. 2015

2009 vs. 2010

2014 vs. 2017

2020 vs. 2013

2008 vs. 2011