facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2010 Ford Mustang vs 2016 Ford Mustang

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Cargo Space: Trunk Volume

2010 Ford Mustang

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
2dr Coupe V6 Trunk Volume13.4 ft30.38 m3
2dr Coupe V6 Premium Trunk Volume13.4 ft30.38 m3
2dr Coupe GT Trunk Volume13.4 ft30.38 m3
2dr Coupe GT Premium Trunk Volume13.4 ft30.38 m3
2dr Coupe Shelby GT500 Trunk Volume13.4 ft30.38 m3
2dr Convertible V6 Trunk Volume9.6 ft30.27 m3
2dr Convertible V6 Premium Trunk Volume9.6 ft30.27 m3
2dr Convertible GT Trunk Volume9.6 ft30.27 m3
2dr Convertible GT Premium Trunk Volume9.6 ft30.27 m3
2dr Convertible Shelby GT500 Trunk Volume9.6 ft30.27 m3

2016 Ford Mustang

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
2dr Fastback V6 Trunk Volume13.5 ft30.38 m3
2dr Fastback EcoBoost Trunk Volume13.5 ft30.38 m3
2dr Fastback EcoBoost Premium Trunk Volume13.5 ft30.38 m3
2dr Fastback GT Trunk Volume13.5 ft30.38 m3
2dr Fastback GT Premium Trunk Volume13.5 ft30.38 m3
2dr Fastback Shelby GT350R Trunk Volume13.5 ft30.38 m3
2dr Fastback Shelby GT350 Trunk Volume13.5 ft30.38 m3
2dr Convertible V6 Trunk Volume11.4 ft30.32 m3
2dr Convertible EcoBoost Premium Trunk Volume11.4 ft30.32 m3
2dr Convertible GT Premium Trunk Volume11.4 ft30.32 m3

Go to the Ford Mustang Cargo Space Data.

AutoPadre's Face

AutoPadre Comparison Tool

Vs.

Compare the Ford Mustang Cargo Space Side-By-Side by Year

2022 vs. 2006

2023 vs. 2011

2012 vs. 2009

2007 vs. 2003

2020 vs. 2017