facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2012 Mercedes-Benz C 300 vs 2014 Mercedes-Benz C 300

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Cargo Space: Trunk Volume

2012 Mercedes-Benz C 300

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
C 250 Coupe Trunk Volume11.7 ft30.33 m3
C 350 Coupe Trunk Volume11.7 ft30.33 m3
C 350 4MATIC Coupe Trunk Volume11.7 ft30.33 m3
C 63 AMG Coupe Trunk Volume11.7 ft30.33 m3
C 250 Sport Sedan Trunk Volume12.4 ft30.35 m3
C 250 Luxury Sedan Trunk Volume12.4 ft30.35 m3
C 300 Sport Sedan Trunk Volume12.4 ft30.35 m3
C 300 Luxury Sedan Trunk Volume12.4 ft30.35 m3
C 350 Sport Sedan Trunk Volume12.4 ft30.35 m3
C 63 AMG Sedan Trunk Volume12.4 ft30.35 m3

2014 Mercedes-Benz C 300

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
C 250 Sport Sedan Trunk Volume12.4 ft30.35 m3
C 250 Luxury Sedan Trunk Volume12.4 ft30.35 m3
C 350 Sport Sedan Trunk Volume12.4 ft30.35 m3
C 63 AMG Sedan Trunk Volume12.4 ft30.35 m3
C 300 4MATIC Sport Sedan Trunk Volume12.4 ft30.35 m3
C 300 4MATIC Luxury Sedan Trunk Volume12.4 ft30.35 m3
C 250 Coupe Trunk Volume11.7 ft30.33 m3
C 350 Coupe Trunk Volume11.7 ft30.33 m3
C 63 AMG Coupe Trunk Volume11.7 ft30.33 m3
C 350 4MATIC Coupe Trunk Volume11.7 ft30.33 m3

Go to the Mercedes-Benz C 300 Cargo Space Data.

AutoPadre's Face

AutoPadre Comparison Tool

Vs.

Compare the Mercedes-Benz C 300 Cargo Space Side-By-Side by Year

2013 vs. 2015

2016 vs. 2009

2014 vs. 2020

2012 vs. 2010

2011 vs. 2017