facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2013 Chrysler 200 vs 2016 Chrysler 200

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Cargo Space: Trunk Volume

2013 Chrysler 200

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
4dr Sedan LX Trunk Volume13.6 ft30.39 m3
4dr Sedan Touring Trunk Volume13.6 ft30.39 m3
4dr Sedan Limited Trunk Volume13.6 ft30.39 m3

2016 Chrysler 200

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
4dr Sedan LX FWD Trunk Volume16.0 ft30.45 m3
4dr Sedan Touring FWD Trunk Volume16.0 ft30.45 m3
4dr Sedan Limited FWD Trunk Volume16.0 ft30.45 m3
4dr Sedan Limited Platinum FWD Trunk Volume16.0 ft30.45 m3
4dr Sedan S FWD Trunk Volume16.0 ft30.45 m3
4dr Sedan C FWD Trunk Volume16.0 ft30.45 m3
4dr Sedan C Platinum FWD Trunk Volume16.0 ft30.45 m3
4dr Sedan S AWD Trunk Volume16.0 ft30.45 m3
4dr Sedan C AWD Trunk Volume16.0 ft30.45 m3
4dr Sedan C Platinum AWD Trunk Volume16.0 ft30.45 m3

Go to the Chrysler 200 Cargo Space Data.

AutoPadre's Face

AutoPadre Comparison Tool

Vs.

Compare the Chrysler 200 Cargo Space Side-By-Side by Year

2015 vs. 2013

2011 vs. 2012

2016 vs. 2014