facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2015 Chevrolet Impala vs 2016 Chevrolet Impala

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Cargo Space: Trunk Volume

2015 Chevrolet Impala

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
LS Trunk Volume18.8 ft30.53 m3
LS CNG Trunk Volume10.0 ft30.28 m3
1LT Trunk Volume18.8 ft30.53 m3
2LT Trunk Volume18.8 ft30.53 m3
3LT CNG Trunk Volume10.0 ft30.28 m3
1LTZ Trunk Volume18.8 ft30.53 m3
2LTZ Trunk Volume18.8 ft30.53 m3

2016 Chevrolet Impala

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
LS Trunk Volume18.8 ft30.53 m3
LS CNG Trunk Volume10.0 ft30.28 m3
1LT Trunk Volume18.8 ft30.53 m3
2LT Trunk Volume18.8 ft30.53 m3
3LT CNG Trunk Volume10.0 ft30.28 m3
1LTZ Trunk Volume18.8 ft30.53 m3
2LTZ Trunk Volume18.8 ft30.53 m3

Go to the Chevrolet Impala Cargo Space Data.

Compare the Chevrolet Impala Cargo Space Side-By-Side by Year

2020 vs. 2009

2000 vs. 2012

2008 vs. 2017

1996 vs. 2004

2006 vs. 2002