facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2017 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Cargo Space: Trunk Volume

2017 Mitsubishi Lancer

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
ES 2.0 FWD Manual Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
ES 2.0 FWD CVT Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
LE 2.0 FWD CVT Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
ES 2.4 AWC CVT Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
SE 2.4 AWC CVT Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
SEL 2.4 AWC CVT Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3

2006 Mitsubishi Lancer

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
4dr Sedan ES Manual Trunk Volume11.3 ft30.32 m3
4dr Sedan ES Auto Trunk Volume11.3 ft30.32 m3
4dr Sedan SE Manual Trunk Volume11.3 ft30.32 m3
4dr Sedan SE Auto Trunk Volume11.3 ft30.32 m3
4dr Sedan OZ-Rally Manual Trunk Volume11.3 ft30.32 m3
4dr Sedan OZ-Rally Auto Trunk Volume11.3 ft30.32 m3
4dr Sedan Ralliart Manual Trunk Volume11.3 ft30.32 m3
4dr Sedan Ralliart Auto Trunk Volume11.3 ft30.32 m3
4dr Sedan Evolution IX Manual Trunk Volume10.2 ft30.29 m3
4dr Sedan Evolution MR Edition Manual Trunk Volume10.2 ft30.29 m3
4dr Sedan Evo RS Manual Trunk Volume10.2 ft30.29 m3

Go to the Mitsubishi Lancer Cargo Space Data.

AutoPadre's Face

AutoPadre Comparison Tool

Vs.

Compare the Mitsubishi Lancer Cargo Space Side-By-Side by Year

2016 vs. 2009

2010 vs. 2004

2011 vs. 2013

2014 vs. 2008

2006 vs. 2005