facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2017 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 2019 Chevrolet Cruze

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Cargo Space: Trunk Volume

2017 Mitsubishi Lancer

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
ES 2.0 FWD Manual Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
ES 2.0 FWD CVT Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
LE 2.0 FWD CVT Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
ES 2.4 AWC CVT Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
SE 2.4 AWC CVT Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3
SEL 2.4 AWC CVT Trunk Volume12.3 ft30.35 m3

2019 Chevrolet Cruze

Cargo Space

Trim Trunk Volume ft3 Trunk Volume m3
Sedan L Trunk Volume14.8 ft30.42 m3
Sedan LS Trunk Volume14.8 ft30.42 m3
Sedan LT Trunk Volume13.9 ft30.39 m3
Sedan Diesel Trunk Volume13.9 ft30.39 m3
Sedan Premier Trunk Volume13.9 ft30.39 m3

Cargo Space: Cargo Volume

No Data Available: 2017 Mitsubishi Lancer Cargo Volume

2019 Chevrolet Cruze

Cargo Volume

Trim Cargo Volume ft3 Cargo Volume m3
Hatchback LS Cargo Volume22.7 ft30.64 m3
Hatchback LT Cargo Volume22.7 ft30.64 m3
Hatchback Diesel Cargo Volume47.2 ft31.34 m3
Hatchback Premier Cargo Volume22.7 ft30.64 m3

Go to the Mitsubishi Lancer Cargo Space Data or the Chevrolet Cruze Cargo Space Data.

AutoPadre's Face

AutoPadre Comparison Tool

Vs.

Compare the Mitsubishi Lancer Cargo Space Side-By-Side by Year

2009 vs. 2017

2013 vs. 2010

2012 vs. 2006

2002 vs. 2003

2008 vs. 2016