facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2006 Ford Ranger vs 2009 Ford Ranger

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Gas Mileage

2006 Ford Ranger

Fuel Mileage (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train MPG City MPG Hwy MPG Combined
Regular Cab Sport3.0L V6RWD172320
Regular Cab STX3.0L V6RWD172320
Regular Cab XL2.3L I4RWD172320
Regular Cab XLT2.3L I4RWD172320
Supercab Sport3.0L V6RWD172219.5
Supercab STX3.0L V6RWD172320
Supercab XL2.3L I4RWD172219.5
Supercab XLT2.3L I4RWD172219.5
Supercab Sport3.0L V6RWD172219.5
Supercab STX3.0L V6RWD172320
Supercab XLT3.0L V6RWD172219.5

2009 Ford Ranger

Fuel Mileage (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train MPG City MPG Hwy MPG Combined
Regular Cab Sport (4 Cyl.)2.3L I4RWD192421.5
Regular Cab XL2.3L I4RWD192421.5
Regular Cab XLT2.3L I4RWD192421.5
Supercab Sport4.0L V6RWD162118.5
Supercab XL2.3L I4RWD162118.5
Supercab XLT2.3L I4RWD162118.5
Supercab Sport4.0L V6RWD162118.5
Supercab XLT4.0L V6RWD162118.5

2006 Ford Ranger

Fuel Mileage (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train L/100km City L/100km Hwy L/100km Combined
Regular Cab Sport3.0L V6RWD14.010.012.0
Regular Cab STX3.0L V6RWD14.010.012.0
Regular Cab XL2.3L I4RWD14.010.012.0
Regular Cab XLT2.3L I4RWD14.010.012.0
Supercab Sport3.0L V6RWD14.011.012.0
Supercab STX3.0L V6RWD14.010.012.0
Supercab XL2.3L I4RWD14.011.012.0
Supercab XLT2.3L I4RWD14.011.012.0
Supercab Sport3.0L V6RWD14.011.012.0
Supercab STX3.0L V6RWD14.010.012.0
Supercab XLT3.0L V6RWD14.011.012.0

2009 Ford Ranger

Fuel Mileage (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train L/100km City L/100km Hwy L/100km Combined
Regular Cab Sport (4 Cyl.)2.3L I4RWD12.010.011.0
Regular Cab XL2.3L I4RWD12.010.011.0
Regular Cab XLT2.3L I4RWD12.010.011.0
Supercab Sport4.0L V6RWD15.011.013.0
Supercab XL2.3L I4RWD15.011.013.0
Supercab XLT2.3L I4RWD15.011.013.0
Supercab Sport4.0L V6RWD15.011.013.0
Supercab XLT4.0L V6RWD15.011.013.0

Go to the Ford Ranger Gas Mileage Data.

AutoPadre's Face

AutoPadre Comparison Tool

Vs.

Compare the Ford Ranger Gas Mileage Side-By-Side by Year

2003 vs. 2010

2005 vs. 2008

2006 vs. 2007

2022 vs. 2002

2019 vs. 2020