facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2003 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 2016 Scion iM

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Headroom

2003 Mitsubishi Lancer

Headroom (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (in) 2nd Row Headroom (in) 3rd Row Headroom (in) 4th Row Headroom (in) 5th Row Headroom (in)
ES2.0L I4FWD38.836.7
Evolution2.0L I4AWD39.936.7
LS2.0L I4FWD38.836.7
OZ Rally2.0L I4FWD38.836.7

2016 Scion iM

Headroom (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (in) 2nd Row Headroom (in) 3rd Row Headroom (in) 4th Row Headroom (in) 5th Row Headroom (in)
1.8L I4FWD39.737.5

2003 Mitsubishi Lancer

Headroom (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (cm) 2nd Row Headroom (cm) 3rd Row Headroom (cm) 4th Row Headroom (cm) 5th Row Headroom (cm)
ES2.0L I4FWD98.693.2
Evolution2.0L I4AWD101.393.2
LS2.0L I4FWD98.693.2
OZ Rally2.0L I4FWD98.693.2

2003 Mitsubishi Lancer

Headroom (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (cm) 2nd Row Headroom (cm) 3rd Row Headroom (cm) 4th Row Headroom (cm) 5th Row Headroom (cm)
1.8L I4FWD100.895.2

Go to the Mitsubishi Lancer Headroom Data or the Scion iM Headroom Data.

AutoPadre's Face

AutoPadre Comparison Tool

Vs.

Compare the Mitsubishi Lancer Headroom Side-By-Side by Year

2014 vs. 2011

2017 vs. 2010

2007 vs. 2008

2012 vs. 2003

2004 vs. 2006

Popular Headroom Model Comparisons

(Mitsubishi Lancer vs.)

2024 Mazda 3

2013 Suzuki SX4

2024 Volkswagen Jetta

2018 Ford Focus

2016 Dodge Dart

2024 Toyota Corolla