facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2004 Toyota Matrix vs 2012 Toyota Matrix

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Headroom

2004 Toyota Matrix

Headroom (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (in) 2nd Row Headroom (in) 3rd Row Headroom (in) 4th Row Headroom (in) 5th Row Headroom (in)
1.8L I4FWD40.639.8
1.8L I4AWD40.639.8
XR1.8L I4FWD40.639.8
XR1.8L I4AWD40.639.8
XRS (6 Spd)1.8L I4FWD40.639.8

2012 Toyota Matrix

Headroom (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (in) 2nd Row Headroom (in) 3rd Row Headroom (in) 4th Row Headroom (in) 5th Row Headroom (in)
L1.8L I4FWD40.539.3
S2.4L I4FWD40.539.3
S2.4L I4AWD40.539.3

2004 Toyota Matrix

Headroom (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (cm) 2nd Row Headroom (cm) 3rd Row Headroom (cm) 4th Row Headroom (cm) 5th Row Headroom (cm)
1.8L I4FWD103.1101.1
1.8L I4AWD103.1101.1
XR1.8L I4FWD103.1101.1
XR1.8L I4AWD103.1101.1
XRS (6 Spd)1.8L I4FWD103.1101.1

2004 Toyota Matrix

Headroom (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (cm) 2nd Row Headroom (cm) 3rd Row Headroom (cm) 4th Row Headroom (cm) 5th Row Headroom (cm)
L1.8L I4FWD102.999.8
S2.4L I4FWD102.999.8
S2.4L I4AWD102.999.8

Go to the Toyota Matrix Headroom Data.

Compare the Toyota Matrix Headroom Side-By-Side by Year

2004 vs. 2008

2010 vs. 2006

2005 vs. 2009

2007 vs. 2003

2011 vs. 2012