facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2013 Chevrolet Camaro vs 2015 Chevrolet Camaro

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Headroom

2013 Chevrolet Camaro

Headroom (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (in) 2nd Row Headroom (in) 3rd Row Headroom (in) 4th Row Headroom (in) 5th Row Headroom (in)
2LT3.6L V6RWD37.835.7
2SS6.2L V8RWD37.835.7
LT3.6L V6RWD37.835.7
SS (, 6 Spd /AT)6.2L V8RWD37.835.7
ZL1 (, 6 Spd /AT)6.2L V8RWD37.835.7
2LT3.6L V6RWD37.435.3
2SS6.2L V8RWD37.435.3
LS3.6L V6RWD37.435.3
LT3.6L V6RWD37.435.3
SS (, 6 Spd /AT)6.2L V8RWD37.435.3
ZL1 (, 6 Spd /AT)6.2L V8RWD37.435.3

2015 Chevrolet Camaro

Headroom (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (in) 2nd Row Headroom (in) 3rd Row Headroom (in) 4th Row Headroom (in) 5th Row Headroom (in)
2LT3.6L V6RWD37.835.7
2SS6.2L V8RWD37.835.7
LT3.6L V6RWD37.835.7
SS6.2L V8RWD37.835.7
ZL16.2L V8RWD37.835.7
2LT3.6L V6RWD37.435.3
2SS6.2L V8RWD37.435.3
LS3.6L V6RWD37.435.3
LT3.6L V6RWD37.435.3
SS6.2L V8RWD37.435.3
Z287.0L V8RWD37.435.3
ZL16.2L V8RWD37.435.3

2013 Chevrolet Camaro

Headroom (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (cm) 2nd Row Headroom (cm) 3rd Row Headroom (cm) 4th Row Headroom (cm) 5th Row Headroom (cm)
2LT3.6L V6RWD9690.7
2SS6.2L V8RWD9690.7
LT3.6L V6RWD9690.7
SS (, 6 Spd /AT)6.2L V8RWD9690.7
ZL1 (, 6 Spd /AT)6.2L V8RWD9690.7
2LT3.6L V6RWD9589.7
2SS6.2L V8RWD9589.7
LS3.6L V6RWD9589.7
LT3.6L V6RWD9589.7
SS (, 6 Spd /AT)6.2L V8RWD9589.7
ZL1 (, 6 Spd /AT)6.2L V8RWD9589.7

2013 Chevrolet Camaro

Headroom (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (cm) 2nd Row Headroom (cm) 3rd Row Headroom (cm) 4th Row Headroom (cm) 5th Row Headroom (cm)
2LT3.6L V6RWD9690.7
2SS6.2L V8RWD9690.7
LT3.6L V6RWD9690.7
SS6.2L V8RWD9690.7
ZL16.2L V8RWD9690.7
2LT3.6L V6RWD9589.7
2SS6.2L V8RWD9589.7
LS3.6L V6RWD9589.7
LT3.6L V6RWD9589.7
SS6.2L V8RWD9589.7
Z287.0L V8RWD9589.7
ZL16.2L V8RWD9589.7

Go to the Chevrolet Camaro Headroom Data.

Compare the Chevrolet Camaro Headroom Side-By-Side by Year

2016 vs. 2017

2023 vs. 2020

2011 vs. 2013

2014 vs. 2015

2012 vs. 2010