facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2016 Ford Mustang vs 2012 Ford Mustang

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Headroom

2016 Ford Mustang

Headroom (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (in) 2nd Row Headroom (in) 3rd Row Headroom (in) 4th Row Headroom (in) 5th Row Headroom (in)
EcoBoost Premium2.3LRWD37.635.7
GT Premium5.0L V8RWD37.635.7
3.7L V6RWD37.635.7
EcoBoost2.3LRWD37.634.8
EcoBoost Premium2.3LRWD37.634.8
GT Premium5.0L V8RWD37.634.8
GT5.0L V8RWD37.634.8
Shelby GT350 R5.2L V8RWD37.634.8
Shelby GT3505.2L V8RWD37.634.8
3.7L V6RWD37.634.8

2012 Ford Mustang

Headroom (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (in) 2nd Row Headroom (in) 3rd Row Headroom (in) 4th Row Headroom (in) 5th Row Headroom (in)
3.7L V6RWD38.836.5
3.7L V6RWD38.534.7
GT5.0L V8RWD38.836.5
Shelby GT5005.4L V8RWD38.836.5
Boss 3025.0L V8RWD38.534.7
GT5.0L V8RWD38.534.7
Shelby GT5005.4L V8RWD38.534.7

2016 Ford Mustang

Headroom (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (cm) 2nd Row Headroom (cm) 3rd Row Headroom (cm) 4th Row Headroom (cm) 5th Row Headroom (cm)
EcoBoost Premium2.3LRWD95.590.7
GT Premium5.0L V8RWD95.590.7
3.7L V6RWD95.590.7
EcoBoost2.3LRWD95.588.4
EcoBoost Premium2.3LRWD95.588.4
GT Premium5.0L V8RWD95.588.4
GT5.0L V8RWD95.588.4
Shelby GT350 R5.2L V8RWD95.588.4
Shelby GT3505.2L V8RWD95.588.4
3.7L V6RWD95.588.4

2016 Ford Mustang

Headroom (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (cm) 2nd Row Headroom (cm) 3rd Row Headroom (cm) 4th Row Headroom (cm) 5th Row Headroom (cm)
3.7L V6RWD98.692.7
3.7L V6RWD97.888.1
GT5.0L V8RWD98.692.7
Shelby GT5005.4L V8RWD98.692.7
Boss 3025.0L V8RWD97.888.1
GT5.0L V8RWD97.888.1
Shelby GT5005.4L V8RWD97.888.1

Go to the Ford Mustang Headroom Data.

AutoPadre's Face

AutoPadre Comparison Tool

Vs.

Compare the Ford Mustang Headroom Side-By-Side by Year

2016 vs. 2014

2020 vs. 2005

2007 vs. 2009

2012 vs. 2019

2018 vs. 2006