facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Headroom

2016 Mitsubishi Lancer

Headroom (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (in) 2nd Row Headroom (in) 3rd Row Headroom (in) 4th Row Headroom (in) 5th Row Headroom (in)
ES2.4L I44WD39.636.9
ES2.0L I4FWD39.636.9
GT2.4L I4FWD38.536.9
SE2.4L I44WD39.636.9
SEL2.4L I44WD39.636.9

2006 Mitsubishi Lancer

Headroom (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (in) 2nd Row Headroom (in) 3rd Row Headroom (in) 4th Row Headroom (in) 5th Row Headroom (in)
ES2.0L I4FWD38.836.7
Evolution2.0L I4AWD39.936.7
Evolution MR2.0L I4AWD39.936.7
Evolution RS2.0L I4AWD39.936.7
OZ Rally2.0L I4FWD38.836.7
Ralliart2.4L I4FWD39.436.7
SE2.0L I4FWD38.836.7

2016 Mitsubishi Lancer

Headroom (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (cm) 2nd Row Headroom (cm) 3rd Row Headroom (cm) 4th Row Headroom (cm) 5th Row Headroom (cm)
ES2.4L I44WD100.693.7
ES2.0L I4FWD100.693.7
GT2.4L I4FWD97.893.7
SE2.4L I44WD100.693.7
SEL2.4L I44WD100.693.7

2016 Mitsubishi Lancer

Headroom (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (cm) 2nd Row Headroom (cm) 3rd Row Headroom (cm) 4th Row Headroom (cm) 5th Row Headroom (cm)
ES2.0L I4FWD98.693.2
Evolution2.0L I4AWD101.393.2
Evolution MR2.0L I4AWD101.393.2
Evolution RS2.0L I4AWD101.393.2
OZ Rally2.0L I4FWD98.693.2
Ralliart2.4L I4FWD100.193.2
SE2.0L I4FWD98.693.2

Go to the Mitsubishi Lancer Headroom Data.

AutoPadre's Face

AutoPadre Comparison Tool

Vs.

Compare the Mitsubishi Lancer Headroom Side-By-Side by Year

2007 vs. 2014

2003 vs. 2009

2011 vs. 2010

2004 vs. 2005

2013 vs. 2006

Popular Headroom Model Comparisons

(Mitsubishi Lancer vs.)

2019 Chevrolet Cruze

2024 Kia Forte

2020 Chevrolet Sonic

2024 Mazda 3

2018 Ford Focus

2016 Dodge Dart