facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 2019 Ford Fiesta

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Headroom

2016 Mitsubishi Lancer

Headroom (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (in) 2nd Row Headroom (in) 3rd Row Headroom (in) 4th Row Headroom (in) 5th Row Headroom (in)
ES2.4L I44WD39.636.9
ES2.0L I4FWD39.636.9
GT2.4L I4FWD38.536.9
SE2.4L I44WD39.636.9
SEL2.4L I44WD39.636.9

2019 Ford Fiesta

Headroom (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (in) 2nd Row Headroom (in) 3rd Row Headroom (in) 4th Row Headroom (in) 5th Row Headroom (in)
S Hatch39.137.2
S1.6L I4FWD39.137.1
SE Hatch1.6L I4FWD39.137.2
SE1.6L I4FWD39.137.1
ST Hatch1.6LFWD39.137.2
ST Line Hatch1.6L I4FWD39.137.2
S39.137.2
SE1.6L I4FWD39.137.2
ST1.6LFWD39.137.2
ST Line1.6L I4FWD39.137.2
S1.6L I4FWD39.137.1
SE1.6L I4FWD39.137.1

2016 Mitsubishi Lancer

Headroom (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (cm) 2nd Row Headroom (cm) 3rd Row Headroom (cm) 4th Row Headroom (cm) 5th Row Headroom (cm)
ES2.4L I44WD100.693.7
ES2.0L I4FWD100.693.7
GT2.4L I4FWD97.893.7
SE2.4L I44WD100.693.7
SEL2.4L I44WD100.693.7

2016 Mitsubishi Lancer

Headroom (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Headroom (cm) 2nd Row Headroom (cm) 3rd Row Headroom (cm) 4th Row Headroom (cm) 5th Row Headroom (cm)
S Hatch99.394.5
S1.6L I4FWD99.394.2
SE Hatch1.6L I4FWD99.394.5
SE1.6L I4FWD99.394.2
ST Hatch1.6LFWD99.394.5
ST Line Hatch1.6L I4FWD99.394.5
S99.394.5
SE1.6L I4FWD99.394.5
ST1.6LFWD99.394.5
ST Line1.6L I4FWD99.394.5
S1.6L I4FWD99.394.2
SE1.6L I4FWD99.394.2

Go to the Mitsubishi Lancer Headroom Data or the Ford Fiesta Headroom Data.

AutoPadre's Face

AutoPadre Comparison Tool

Vs.

Compare the Mitsubishi Lancer Headroom Side-By-Side by Year

2002 vs. 2008

2015 vs. 2003

2013 vs. 2005

2011 vs. 2016

2007 vs. 2006

Popular Headroom Model Comparisons

(Mitsubishi Lancer vs.)

2022 Honda Insight

2024 Toyota Corolla

2019 Chevrolet Cruze

2018 Ford Focus

2013 Suzuki SX4

2016 Scion iM