facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2006 Cadillac CTS vs 2013 Cadillac CTS

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Engine Horsepower & Torque

2006 Cadillac CTS

Engine Horsepower & Torque

Trim Eng. Drive train HP Torque (ft-lbs)
2.8L2.8L V6RWD210194
3.6L3.6L V6RWD255252
V VSeries 6 Speed6.0L V8RWD400395

2013 Cadillac CTS

Engine Horsepower & Torque

Trim Eng. Drive train HP Torque (ft-lbs)
3.6L V6RWD318275
3.6L V6AWD318275
Performance3.6L V6RWD318275
Performance3.6L V6AWD318275
Premium3.6L V6RWD318275
Premium3.6L V6AWD318275
Luxury3.0L V6RWD270223
Luxury3.0L V6AWD270223
Performance3.6L V6RWD318275
Performance3.6L V6AWD318275
Premium3.6L V6RWD318275
Premium3.6L V6AWD318275
3.0L V6RWD270223
3.0L V6AWD270223
Luxury3.0L V6RWD270223
Luxury3.0L V6AWD270223
Performance3.6L V6RWD318275
Performance3.6L V6AWD318275
Premium3.6L V6RWD318275
Premium3.6L V6AWD318275
V VSeries6.2L V8RWD556551
V VSeries6.2L V8RWD556551
V VSeries6.2L V8RWD556551

Engine Horsepower Per Unit Of Displacement

2006 Cadillac CTS

Horsepower Per Liter & Inch3

Trim Eng. Drive train HP Per Liter HP Per Inch3
2.8L2.8L V6RWD751.23
3.6L3.6L V6RWD701.16
V VSeries 6 Speed6.0L V8RWD661.09

2013 Cadillac CTS

Horsepower Per Liter & Inch3

Trim Eng. Drive train HP Per Liter HP Per Inch3
3.6L V6RWD881.45
3.6L V6AWD881.45
Performance3.6L V6RWD881.45
Performance3.6L V6AWD881.45
Premium3.6L V6RWD881.45
Premium3.6L V6AWD881.45
Luxury3.0L V6RWD901.48
Luxury3.0L V6AWD901.48
Performance3.6L V6RWD881.45
Performance3.6L V6AWD881.45
Premium3.6L V6RWD881.45
Premium3.6L V6AWD881.45
3.0L V6RWD901.48
3.0L V6AWD901.48
Luxury3.0L V6RWD901.48
Luxury3.0L V6AWD901.48
Performance3.6L V6RWD881.45
Performance3.6L V6AWD881.45
Premium3.6L V6RWD881.45
Premium3.6L V6AWD881.45
V VSeries6.2L V8RWD891.47
V VSeries6.2L V8RWD891.47
V VSeries6.2L V8RWD891.47

Go to the Cadillac CTS Horsepower And Torque Data.

AutoPadre's Face

AutoPadre Comparison Tool

Vs.

Compare the Cadillac CTS Horsepower And Torque Side-By-Side by Year

2018 vs. 2010

2008 vs. 2014

2007 vs. 2019

2011 vs. 2004

2012 vs. 2003