facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2002 Subaru Forester vs 2016 Subaru Forester

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Legroom

2002 Subaru Forester

Legroom (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Legroom (in) 2nd Row Legroom (in) 3rd Row Legroom (in) 4th Row Legroom (in) 5th Row Legroom (in)
L2.5LAWD4333.4
S2.5LAWD4333.4

2016 Subaru Forester

Legroom (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Legroom (in) 2nd Row Legroom (in) 3rd Row Legroom (in) 4th Row Legroom (in) 5th Row Legroom (in)
i H42.5L H4AWD4338
i Limited H42.5L H4AWD4338
i Premium H42.5L H4AWD4338
i Touring H42.5L H4AWD4338
XT Premium H42.0L H4AWD4338
XT Touring H42.0L H4AWD4338

2002 Subaru Forester

Legroom (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Legroom (cm) 2nd Row Legroom (cm) 3rd Row Legroom (cm) 4th Row Legroom (cm) 5th Row Legroom (cm)
L2.5LAWD109.284.8
S2.5LAWD109.284.8

2016 Subaru Forester

Legroom (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Legroom (cm) 2nd Row Legroom (cm) 3rd Row Legroom (cm) 4th Row Legroom (cm) 5th Row Legroom (cm)
i H42.5L H4AWD109.296.5
i Limited H42.5L H4AWD109.296.5
i Premium H42.5L H4AWD109.296.5
i Touring H42.5L H4AWD109.296.5
XT Premium H42.0L H4AWD109.296.5
XT Touring H42.0L H4AWD109.296.5

Go to the Subaru Forester Legroom Data.

Compare the Subaru Forester Legroom Side-By-Side by Year

2018 vs. 2010

2014 vs. 2015

2021 vs. 2022

2009 vs. 2006

2005 vs. 2023