facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2004 Toyota Matrix vs 2010 Toyota Matrix

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Legroom

2004 Toyota Matrix

Legroom (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Legroom (in) 2nd Row Legroom (in) 3rd Row Legroom (in) 4th Row Legroom (in) 5th Row Legroom (in)
1.8L I4FWD41.836.3
1.8L I4AWD41.836.3
XR1.8L I4FWD41.836.3
XR1.8L I4AWD41.836.3
XRS (6 Spd)1.8L I4FWD41.836.3

2010 Toyota Matrix

Legroom (Imp.)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Legroom (in) 2nd Row Legroom (in) 3rd Row Legroom (in) 4th Row Legroom (in) 5th Row Legroom (in)
1.8L I4FWD41.636.2
S2.4L I4FWD41.636.3
S2.4L I4AWD41.636.3
XRS2.4L I4FWD41.636.3

2004 Toyota Matrix

Legroom (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Legroom (cm) 2nd Row Legroom (cm) 3rd Row Legroom (cm) 4th Row Legroom (cm) 5th Row Legroom (cm)
1.8L I4FWD106.292.2
1.8L I4AWD106.292.2
XR1.8L I4FWD106.292.2
XR1.8L I4AWD106.292.2
XRS (6 Spd)1.8L I4FWD106.292.2

2010 Toyota Matrix

Legroom (Metric)

Trim Eng. Drive train 1st Row Legroom (cm) 2nd Row Legroom (cm) 3rd Row Legroom (cm) 4th Row Legroom (cm) 5th Row Legroom (cm)
1.8L I4FWD105.791.9
S2.4L I4FWD105.792.2
S2.4L I4AWD105.792.2
XRS2.4L I4FWD105.792.2

Go to the Toyota Matrix Legroom Data.

Compare the Toyota Matrix Legroom Side-By-Side by Year

2011 vs. 2006

2007 vs. 2010

2012 vs. 2009

2008 vs. 2005

2004 vs. 2013