Specifications Comparison: 2017 Chevrolet Camaro vs 2002 Chevrolet Camaro

Legroom

Trim	Eng.	Drive train	1st Row Legroom (in)	2nd Row Legroom (in)
2LT	2.0L I4	RWD	43.9	29.9
2LT	2.0L I4	RWD	43.9	29.9
2SS	6.2L V8	RWD	43.9	29.9
LS	2.0L I4	RWD	43.9	29.9
LS	2.0L I4	RWD	43.9	29.9
LT	2.0L I4	RWD	43.9	29.9
LT	2.0L I4	RWD	43.9	29.9
SS	6.2L V8	RWD	43.9	29.9
ZL1	6.2L V8	RWD	43.9	29.9
2LT	2.0L I4	RWD	43.9	29.9
2LT	2.0L I4	RWD	43.9	29.9
2SS	6.2L V8	RWD	43.9	29.9
LS	2.0L I4	RWD	43.9	29.9
LS	2.0L I4	RWD	43.9	29.9
LT	2.0L I4	RWD	43.9	29.9
LT	2.0L I4	RWD	43.9	29.9
SS	6.2L V8	RWD	43.9	29.9
ZL1	6.2L V8	RWD	43.9	29.9

Trim	Eng.	Drive train	1st Row Legroom (in)	2nd Row Legroom (in)
	3.8L V6	RWD	43	26.8
	3.8L V6	RWD	43	26.8
SS	5.7L V8	RWD	43	26.8
Z28	5.7L V8	RWD	43	26.8
SS	5.7L V8	RWD	43	26.8
Z28	5.7L V8	RWD	43	26.8

Trim	Eng.	Drive train	1st Row Legroom (cm)	2nd Row Legroom (cm)
2LT	2.0L I4	RWD	111.5	75.9
2LT	2.0L I4	RWD	111.5	75.9
2SS	6.2L V8	RWD	111.5	75.9
LS	2.0L I4	RWD	111.5	75.9
LS	2.0L I4	RWD	111.5	75.9
LT	2.0L I4	RWD	111.5	75.9
LT	2.0L I4	RWD	111.5	75.9
SS	6.2L V8	RWD	111.5	75.9
ZL1	6.2L V8	RWD	111.5	75.9
2LT	2.0L I4	RWD	111.5	75.9
2LT	2.0L I4	RWD	111.5	75.9
2SS	6.2L V8	RWD	111.5	75.9
LS	2.0L I4	RWD	111.5	75.9
LS	2.0L I4	RWD	111.5	75.9
LT	2.0L I4	RWD	111.5	75.9
LT	2.0L I4	RWD	111.5	75.9
SS	6.2L V8	RWD	111.5	75.9
ZL1	6.2L V8	RWD	111.5	75.9