facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2014 Mazda CX-5 vs 2013 Mazda CX-5

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Turning Diameter & Radius (Curb To Curb)

2014 Mazda CX-5

Turning Diameter & Radius (Curb To Curb)

Trim Eng. Drive train Diameter Curb To Curb (ft) Diameter Curb To Curb (m) Radius Curb To Curb (ft) Radius Curb To Curb (m)
GT2.5L I4FWD36.711.218.45.6
GT2.5L I4AWD36.711.218.45.6
Sport2.0L I4FWD36.711.218.45.6
Sport2.0L I4AWD36.711.218.45.6
Touring2.5L I4FWD36.711.218.45.6
Touring2.5L I4AWD36.711.218.45.6

2013 Mazda CX-5

Turning Diameter & Radius (Curb To Curb)

Trim Eng. Drive train Diameter Curb To Curb (ft) Diameter Curb To Curb (m) Radius Curb To Curb (ft) Radius Curb To Curb (m)
GT2.0L I4FWD38.411.719.25.9
GT2.0L I4AWD38.411.719.25.9
Sport2.0L I4FWD38.411.719.25.9
Sport2.0L I4AWD38.411.719.25.9
Touring2.0L I4FWD38.411.719.25.9
Touring2.0L I4AWD38.411.719.25.9

Go to the Mazda CX-5 Turning Radius Data.

AutoPadre's Face

AutoPadre Comparison Tool

Vs.

Compare the Mazda CX-5 Turning Radius Side-By-Side by Year

2017 vs. 2014

2023 vs. 2016

2019 vs. 2022

2021 vs. 2020

2018 vs. 2013

Popular Turning Radius Model Comparisons

(Mazda CX-5 vs.)

2024 Ford Escape

2023 Jeep Cherokee

2024 Nissan Kicks

2024 GMC Terrain

2024 Honda CR-V

2024 Subaru Crosstrek