facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2014 Mitsubishi Outlander vs 2024 Mazda CX-5

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Turning Diameter & Radius (Curb To Curb)

2014 Mitsubishi Outlander

Turning Diameter & Radius (Curb To Curb)

Trim Eng. Drive train Diameter Curb To Curb (ft) Diameter Curb To Curb (m) Radius Curb To Curb (ft) Radius Curb To Curb (m)
ES2.4L I4FWD34.810.617.45.3
GT3.0L V64WD34.810.617.45.3
GT Touring3.0L V64WD34.810.617.45.3
SE2.4L I4FWD34.810.617.45.3
SE2.4L I44WD34.810.617.45.3
SE Touring2.4L I4FWD34.810.617.45.3
SE Touring2.4L I44WD34.810.617.45.3
Sport ES2.0L I4FWD34.810.617.45.3
Sport ES2.0L I44WD34.810.617.45.3
Sport SE2.0L I4FWD34.810.617.45.3
Sport SE2.0L I44WD34.810.617.45.3

2024 Mazda CX-5

Turning Diameter & Radius (Curb To Curb)

Trim Eng. Drive train Diameter Curb To Curb (ft) Diameter Curb To Curb (m) Radius Curb To Curb (ft) Radius Curb To Curb (m)
2.5 Carbon2.5L I4AWD36.0
2.5 S Carbon Edition2.5L I4AWD36.0
2.5 S Preferred Package2.5L I4AWD36.0
2.5 S Premium Package2.5L I4AWD36.0
2.5 S Premium Plus Package2.5L I4AWD36.0
2.5 S Select Package2.5L I4AWD36.0
2.5 Premium Package2.5L I4AWD36.0
2.5 Signature2.5L I4AWD36.0

Go to the Mitsubishi Outlander Turning Radius Data or the Mazda CX-5 Turning Radius Data.

Compare the Mitsubishi Outlander Turning Radius Side-By-Side by Year

2018 vs. 2024

2020 vs. 2021

2019 vs. 2016

2017 vs. 2008

2014 vs. 2015