facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2002 Ford Mustang vs 2016 Ford Mustang

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Height

2002 Ford Mustang

Height

Trim Eng. Drive train Height (in) Height (ft) Height (cm) Height (m)
3.8L V6RWD53.24.43135.11.35
3.8L V6RWD53.14.42134.91.35
GT4.6L V8RWD53.24.43135.11.35
GT4.6L V8RWD53.14.42134.91.35

2016 Ford Mustang

Height

Trim Eng. Drive train Height (in) Height (ft) Height (cm) Height (m)
EcoBoost Premium2.3LRWD54.94.58139.41.39
GT Premium5.0L V8RWD54.94.58139.41.39
3.7L V6RWD54.94.58139.41.39
EcoBoost2.3LRWD54.44.53138.21.38
EcoBoost Premium2.3LRWD54.44.53138.21.38
GT Premium5.0L V8RWD54.44.53138.21.38
GT5.0L V8RWD54.44.53138.21.38
Shelby GT350 R5.2L V8RWD54.24.52137.71.38
Shelby GT3505.2L V8RWD54.24.52137.71.38
3.7L V6RWD54.44.53138.21.38

Length

2002 Ford Mustang

Length

Trim Eng. Drive train Length (in) Length (ft) Length (cm) Length (m)
3.8L V6RWD183.215.27465.34.65
3.8L V6RWD183.215.27465.34.65
GT4.6L V8RWD183.215.27465.34.65
GT4.6L V8RWD183.215.27465.34.65

2016 Ford Mustang

Length

Trim Eng. Drive train Length (in) Length (ft) Length (cm) Length (m)
EcoBoost Premium2.3LRWD188.315.69478.34.78
GT Premium5.0L V8RWD188.315.69478.34.78
3.7L V6RWD188.315.69478.34.78
EcoBoost2.3LRWD188.315.69478.34.78
EcoBoost Premium2.3LRWD188.315.69478.34.78
GT Premium5.0L V8RWD188.315.69478.34.78
GT5.0L V8RWD188.315.69478.34.78
Shelby GT350 R5.2L V8RWD188.915.74479.84.8
Shelby GT3505.2L V8RWD188.915.74479.84.8
3.7L V6RWD188.315.69478.34.78

Width Without Mirrors

2002 Ford Mustang

Width W/O Mirrors

Trim Eng. Drive train Width W/O Mirrors (in) Width W/O Mirrors (ft) Width W/O Mirrors (cm) Width W/O Mirrors (m)
3.8L V6RWD73.16.09185.71.86
3.8L V6RWD73.16.09185.71.86
GT4.6L V8RWD73.16.09185.71.86
GT4.6L V8RWD73.16.09185.71.86

2016 Ford Mustang

Width W/O Mirrors

Trim Eng. Drive train Width W/O Mirrors (in) Width W/O Mirrors (ft) Width W/O Mirrors (cm) Width W/O Mirrors (m)
EcoBoost Premium2.3LRWD75.46.28191.51.92
GT Premium5.0L V8RWD75.46.28191.51.92
3.7L V6RWD75.46.28191.51.92
EcoBoost2.3LRWD75.46.28191.51.92
EcoBoost Premium2.3LRWD75.46.28191.51.92
GT Premium5.0L V8RWD75.46.28191.51.92
GT5.0L V8RWD75.46.28191.51.92
Shelby GT350 R5.2L V8RWD75.96.33192.81.93
Shelby GT3505.2L V8RWD75.96.33192.81.93
3.7L V6RWD75.46.28191.51.92

Wheelbase

2002 Ford Mustang

Wheelbase

Trim Eng. Drive train Wheelbase (in) Wheelbase (ft) Wheelbase (cm) Wheelbase (m)
3.8L V6RWD101.38.44257.32.57
3.8L V6RWD101.38.44257.32.57
GT4.6L V8RWD101.38.44257.32.57
GT4.6L V8RWD101.38.44257.32.57

2016 Ford Mustang

Wheelbase

Trim Eng. Drive train Wheelbase (in) Wheelbase (ft) Wheelbase (cm) Wheelbase (m)
EcoBoost Premium2.3LRWD107.18.922722.72
GT Premium5.0L V8RWD107.18.922722.72
3.7L V6RWD107.18.922722.72
EcoBoost2.3LRWD107.18.922722.72
EcoBoost Premium2.3LRWD107.18.922722.72
GT Premium5.0L V8RWD107.18.922722.72
GT5.0L V8RWD107.18.922722.72
Shelby GT350 R5.2L V8RWD107.18.922722.72
Shelby GT3505.2L V8RWD107.18.922722.72
3.7L V6RWD107.18.922722.72

Go to the Ford Mustang Vehicle Dimensions Data.

AutoPadre's Face

AutoPadre Comparison Tool

Vs.

Compare the Ford Mustang Vehicle Dimensions Side-By-Side by Year

2004 vs. 2017

2005 vs. 2007

2006 vs. 2016

2023 vs. 2003

2020 vs. 2013