facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2004 Isuzu Rodeo vs 2002 Isuzu Rodeo

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Height

2004 Isuzu Rodeo

Height

Trim Eng. Drive train Height (in) Height (ft) Height (cm) Height (m)
S3.2L V6RWD66.45.53168.71.69
S 3.53.5L V6RWD69.45.78176.31.76
S 3.53.5L V64WD69.45.78176.31.76
S3.2L V64WD66.55.54168.91.69

2002 Isuzu Rodeo

Height

Trim Eng. Drive train Height (in) Height (ft) Height (cm) Height (m)
LS3.2L V6RWD69.45.78176.31.76
LS3.2L V64WD69.45.78176.31.76
LSE3.2L V6RWD69.45.78176.31.76
LSE3.2L V64WD69.45.78176.31.76
S (4 Cyl)2.2L I4RWD66.45.53168.71.69
S3.2L V6RWD66.55.54168.91.69
S3.2L V64WD66.55.54168.91.69
SE3.2L V6RWD66.55.54168.91.69
SE3.2L V64WD66.55.54168.91.69
Sport Hard Top (5 Spd)2.2L I4RWD67.15.59170.41.7
Sport Hard Top AT2.2L I4RWD67.15.59170.41.7
Sport Soft Top (5 Spd)2.2L I4RWD67.15.59170.41.7
Sport Hard Top AT3.2L V6RWD67.15.59170.41.7
Sport Hard Top AT3.2L V64WD67.15.59170.41.7
Sport Soft Top AT3.2L V6RWD67.15.59170.41.7
Sport Soft Top AT3.2L V64WD67.15.59170.41.7

Length

2004 Isuzu Rodeo

Length

Trim Eng. Drive train Length (in) Length (ft) Length (cm) Length (m)
S3.2L V6RWD177.514.79450.94.51
S 3.53.5L V6RWD177.514.79450.94.51
S 3.53.5L V64WD177.514.79450.94.51
S3.2L V64WD177.514.79450.94.51

2002 Isuzu Rodeo

Length

Trim Eng. Drive train Length (in) Length (ft) Length (cm) Length (m)
LS3.2L V6RWD177.514.79450.94.51
LS3.2L V64WD177.514.79450.94.51
LSE3.2L V6RWD177.514.79450.94.51
LSE3.2L V64WD177.514.79450.94.51
S (4 Cyl)2.2L I4RWD177.514.79450.94.51
S3.2L V6RWD177.514.79450.94.51
S3.2L V64WD177.514.79450.94.51
SE3.2L V6RWD177.514.79450.94.51
SE3.2L V64WD177.514.79450.94.51
Sport Hard Top (5 Spd)2.2L I4RWD170.314.19432.64.33
Sport Hard Top AT2.2L I4RWD170.314.19432.64.33
Sport Soft Top (5 Spd)2.2L I4RWD170.314.19432.64.33
Sport Hard Top AT3.2L V6RWD170.314.19432.64.33
Sport Hard Top AT3.2L V64WD170.314.19432.64.33
Sport Soft Top AT3.2L V6RWD170.314.19432.64.33
Sport Soft Top AT3.2L V64WD170.314.19432.64.33

Width Without Mirrors

2004 Isuzu Rodeo

Width W/O Mirrors

Trim Eng. Drive train Width W/O Mirrors (in) Width W/O Mirrors (ft) Width W/O Mirrors (cm) Width W/O Mirrors (m)
S3.2L V6RWD70.45.87178.81.79
S 3.53.5L V6RWD70.45.87178.81.79
S 3.53.5L V64WD70.45.87178.81.79
S3.2L V64WD70.45.87178.81.79

2002 Isuzu Rodeo

Width W/O Mirrors

Trim Eng. Drive train Width W/O Mirrors (in) Width W/O Mirrors (ft) Width W/O Mirrors (cm) Width W/O Mirrors (m)
LS3.2L V6RWD70.45.87178.81.79
LS3.2L V64WD70.45.87178.81.79
LSE3.2L V6RWD70.45.87178.81.79
LSE3.2L V64WD70.45.87178.81.79
S (4 Cyl)2.2L I4RWD70.45.87178.81.79
S3.2L V6RWD70.45.87178.81.79
S3.2L V64WD70.45.87178.81.79
SE3.2L V6RWD70.45.87178.81.79
SE3.2L V64WD70.45.87178.81.79
Sport Hard Top (5 Spd)2.2L I4RWD70.45.87178.81.79
Sport Hard Top AT2.2L I4RWD70.45.87178.81.79
Sport Soft Top (5 Spd)2.2L I4RWD70.45.87178.81.79
Sport Hard Top AT3.2L V6RWD70.45.87178.81.79
Sport Hard Top AT3.2L V64WD70.45.87178.81.79
Sport Soft Top AT3.2L V6RWD70.45.87178.81.79
Sport Soft Top AT3.2L V64WD70.45.87178.81.79

Wheelbase

2004 Isuzu Rodeo

Wheelbase

Trim Eng. Drive train Wheelbase (in) Wheelbase (ft) Wheelbase (cm) Wheelbase (m)
S3.2L V6RWD106.48.87270.32.7
S 3.53.5L V6RWD106.48.87270.32.7
S 3.53.5L V64WD106.48.87270.32.7
S3.2L V64WD106.48.87270.32.7

2002 Isuzu Rodeo

Wheelbase

Trim Eng. Drive train Wheelbase (in) Wheelbase (ft) Wheelbase (cm) Wheelbase (m)
LS3.2L V6RWD106.48.87270.32.7
LS3.2L V64WD106.48.87270.32.7
LSE3.2L V6RWD106.48.87270.32.7
LSE3.2L V64WD106.48.87270.32.7
S (4 Cyl)2.2L I4RWD106.48.87270.32.7
S3.2L V6RWD106.48.87270.32.7
S3.2L V64WD106.48.87270.32.7
SE3.2L V6RWD106.48.87270.32.7
SE3.2L V64WD106.48.87270.32.7
Sport Hard Top (5 Spd)2.2L I4RWD96.98.08246.12.46
Sport Hard Top AT2.2L I4RWD96.98.08246.12.46
Sport Soft Top (5 Spd)2.2L I4RWD96.98.08246.12.46
Sport Hard Top AT3.2L V6RWD96.98.08246.12.46
Sport Hard Top AT3.2L V64WD96.98.08246.12.46
Sport Soft Top AT3.2L V6RWD96.98.08246.12.46
Sport Soft Top AT3.2L V64WD96.98.08246.12.46

Go to the Isuzu Rodeo Vehicle Dimensions Data.

Compare the Isuzu Rodeo Vehicle Dimensions Side-By-Side by Year

2002 vs. 2004