facebook pixel

Specifications Comparison: 2004 Ford Explorer vs 2024 Mazda CX-9

Researched By The AutoPadre Staff

Turning Diameter & Radius (Curb To Curb)

2004 Ford Explorer

Turning Diameter & Radius (Curb To Curb)

Trim Eng. Drive train Diameter Curb To Curb (ft) Diameter Curb To Curb (m) Radius Curb To Curb (ft) Radius Curb To Curb (m)
Eddie Bauer4.0L V6RWD38.411.719.25.9
Eddie Bauer 4WD/4.0L V64WD38.411.719.25.9
Limited4.0L V6RWD38.411.719.25.9
Limited 4WD/4.0L V64WD38.411.719.25.9
XLS4.0L V6RWD38.411.719.25.9
XLS 4WD/4.0L V64WD38.411.719.25.9
XLT4.0L V6RWD38.411.719.25.9
XLT4.0L V64WD38.411.719.25.9
Sport Trac XLS4.0L V6RWD44.913.722.46.8
Sport Trac XLS4.0L V64WD44.913.722.46.8
Sport Trac XLT4.0L V6RWD44.913.722.46.8
Sport Trac XLT4.0L V64WD44.913.722.46.8

2024 Mazda CX-9

Turning Diameter & Radius (Curb To Curb)

Trim Eng. Drive train Diameter Curb To Curb (ft) Diameter Curb To Curb (m) Radius Curb To Curb (ft) Radius Curb To Curb (m)
0 3.3 PreferredElectric 3.3L I6AWD41.212.620.66.3
0 3.3 Preferred PlusElectric 3.3L I6AWD41.212.620.66.3
0 3.3 PremiumElectric 3.3L I6AWD41.212.620.66.3
0 3.3 Premium PlusElectric 3.3L I6AWD41.212.620.66.3
0 3.3 SElectric 3.3L I6AWD41.212.620.66.3
0 3.3 S PremiumElectric 3.3L I6AWD41.212.620.66.3
0 3.3 S Premium PlusElectric 3.3L I6AWD41.212.620.66.3
0 3.3 SelectElectric 3.3L I6AWD41.212.620.66.3
0 PHEV 3.3 PreferredElectric 3.3L I6AWD41.212.620.66.3
0 PHEV 3.3 Preferred PlusElectric 3.3L I6AWD41.212.620.66.3
0 PHEV 3.3 PremiumElectric 3.3L I6AWD41.212.620.66.3
0 PHEV 3.3 Premium PlusElectric 3.3L I6AWD41.212.620.66.3
0 PHEV 3.3 SElectric 3.3L I6AWD41.212.620.66.3
0 PHEV 3.3 S PremiumElectric 3.3L I6AWD41.212.620.66.3
0 PHEV 3.3 S Premium PlusElectric 3.3L I6AWD41.212.620.66.3
0 PHEV 3.3 SelectElectric 3.3L I6AWD41.212.620.66.3

Go to the Ford Explorer Turning Radius Data or the Mazda CX-9 Turning Radius Data.

Compare the Ford Explorer Turning Radius Side-By-Side by Year

2015 vs. 2006

2009 vs. 2003

2002 vs. 2017

2018 vs. 2007

2008 vs. 2016